Hall v. Hubbard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the MetroCards defendant possessed were forged instruments under article 170 of the Penal Law” because they had been bent to allow the defendant to “acquire free rides on what were worthless MetroCards”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).