Hall v. Hezlep

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an agency is free within \the limits of reasoned interpretation to change course\ only if it \adequately justifies the change\
• holding that an agency is free within “the limits of reasoned interpretation to change course” only if it “adequately justifies the change”
• holding that an agency’s interpretation of an ambiguous statute continues to receive deference even when that interpretation is “inconsistent with its past practice”
• holding that an agency must “adequately explain[ ] the reasons for a reversal of policy” in an interpretation that is itself “otherwise entitled to Chevron deference”
• holding that the two-step Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 104 S.Ct. 2778, 81 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984), analysis applies to FCC rulings
• holding that the two-step Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 104 S.Ct. 2778, 81 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984), analysis applies to FCC rulings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).