Hall v. Haynes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the language of Rule 4.03 is mandatory in nature and must be strictly enforced
• noting that the purpose of service of process is “to insure that process is served in a manner reasonably calculated to give a party defendant adequate notice of the pending judicial 5 Section 16-15-901(b
• explaining that defendant or authorized agent must sign the return receipt
• explaining that alternate service upon a corporation by certified mail must be made upon “an officer or managing agent thereof, or ... any other agent authorized by appointment or by law to receive service on behalf of the corporation’’
• discussing “Rule 4.03’s explicit restriction of who[ ] may sign the return receipt”
• discussing “Rule 4.03’s explicit restriction of who[ ] may sign the return receipt”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).