Hall v. Hall
Citations
- 41 Wash. 186
- 83 P. 108
- 1905 Wash. LEXIS 1089
Syllabus
<p>Courts — Federal Question — Rule oe Decision. Tbe rights of husband and wife under the state laws to lands acquired from the United States before final proof, raises a Federal question upon which the decisions of the United States courts control.</p> <p>Public Lands — Homestead—Husband and Wiee — Divorce—Community Property. A divorced wife acquires no interest m a homestead, patent for which is subsequently issued to the husband, where at the time of the divorce the husband had only the right of occupancy and a preference right to make entry upon the extension of the public surveys; since the Federal law controls as to the title obtained by a patent and the community property laws of the state are not recognized.</p>
Judges: Rudkin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Teynor v. HeibleWashington Supreme Court· 1913-07-01· cited 20×
- Cunningham v. KrutzWashington Supreme Court· 1905-12-27· cited 15×
- Eckert v. SchmittWashington Supreme Court· 1910-09-06· cited 12×
- Delacey v. Commercial Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1909-02-02· cited 9×
- Krieg v. LewisWashington Supreme Court· 1909-12-06· cited 7×
- Buchser v. MorssNinth Circuit· 1913-02-03· cited 4×
- Buchser v. MorssE.D. Washington· 1912-04-01· cited 1×
- Ellis v. EllisCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1950-05-26
- Wingard v. WingardWashington Supreme Court· 1909-12-17
- In re Estate of FosterCalifornia Superior Court, San Francisco County· 1909-03-09
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.