Hall v. Hall

Citations

• 2017 Ohio 7932

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in overruling Appellant's motion for contempt. A standard order requiring \parents\ to provide notice of intent to relocate did not apply, because the parties did not have children as a result of their relationship and would not be considered \parents\ for purposes of the order. The trial court also did not err in denying Appellant's motion for relief from judgment. The motion was untimely under Civ.R. 60(B)(2) and (3) because it was not filed within one year of the divorce judgment. Furthermore, relief from judgment is restricted in this situation to Civ.R. 60(B)(1), (2), or (3). Even if this had been otherwise, Appellant could not circumvent the time limit by resorting to Civ.R. 60(B)(5), where he merely duplicated grounds that were subject to the limitation. Affirmed.