Hall v. Hall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where a party asserts “an arguably meritorious position, there [is] not a ‘complete absence of any justiciable issue of law or fact’ ” such that an award of attorney fees is appropriate
• “where a party asserts an 12 arguably meritorious position, there was not a complete absence of any justiciable issue of law or fact such that an award of attorney fees is appropriate”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Doster v. Bates
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-03-10· cited 15×
• Gibson Construction Co. v. GAA Acquisitions I, LLC
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-03-09· cited 13×
• J.H. v. Ada S. McKinley Community Services, Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2006-12-29· cited 12×
• Bircoll v. Rosenthal
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-05-17· cited 11×
• Russell v. Sparmer
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2016-10-28· cited 8×
• Rachel F. Shoenthal v. Dekalb County Employees Retirement System Pension Board
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2017-09-28· cited 7×
• Kinard v. Worldcom, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-06-26· cited 5×
• Griffin v. Turner
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2019-06-21· cited 3×
• Gary Daniel Griffin v. Dennis R. Turner
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2019-06-21

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Cobb County School District v. Mat Factory, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1994-11-28· cited 27×
• Moore v. Harris
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1991-09-19· cited 11×