Skip to main content
· 1/1/1917

Hall v. Equitable Surety Co.

Citations

  • 126 Ark. 535
  • 191 S.W. 32
  • 1917 Ark. LEXIS 222

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A]lmost every court that has addressed an Information Quality Act challenge has held that the statute ‘creates no legal rights in any third parties[]’”.
  • “[T]he fact that the State has long accepted billions of dollars notwithstanding the challenged conditions may be an additional relevant factor in the contract-like analysis the Court has in mind for assessing the constitutionality of Spending Clause legislation.”
  • “[T]he fact that the State has long accepted billions of dollars notwithstanding the challenged conditions may be an additional relevant factor in the contract-like analysis the Court has in mind for assessing the constitutionality of Spending Clause legislation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.