Skip to main content
· 7/19/1978

Hall v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Citations

  • 456 F. Supp. 695
  • 17 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1212
  • 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16489
  • 17 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 8492

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to find 28 an implied cause of action exists for a charging party to sue the EEOC to “more fully or 1 speedily investigate or attempt to conciliate their charge” because parties may simply 2 circumvent the EEOC and file their own suit
  • “But the message of [Accardi] remains clear that an agency's violation of its regulations is not a violation of due process if no interests within the protection of the due process clause are involved.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Peckham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.