Skip to main content
· 5/23/1995

Hall v. City of Brawley

Citations

  • 887 F. Supp. 1333
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7531
  • 68 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1343
  • 1995 WL 328020

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding impermissible motivation, sustaining “same decision” defense, but affording statutory remedies permitted under Civil Rights Act of 1991 but not under Price Waterhouse
  • finding impermissible motivation, sustaining “same decision” defense, but affording statutory remedies permitted under Civil Rights Act of 1991 but not under Price Waterhouse
  • finding impermissible motivation, sustaining “same decision” defense, but affording statutory remedies permitted under Civil Rights Act of 1991 but not under Price Waterhouse
  • “Where the court finds that discrimination was a motivating factor in the adverse employment action, a violation of Title VII is established”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Battaglia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.