· 2/12/1982
Hall v. Board of Trustees
Citations
- 671 F.2d 269
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “[a] district court has power to dismiss an action for refusal of the plaintiff to comply with any order of court”
- providing that pro se litigants are not excused from complying with court orders, substantive law, and procedural law
- stating that “pro se litigants are not excused from failing to comply with substantive and procedural law”
- noting that “pro se litigants are not excused from failing to comply with substantive and procedural law,” and that “the court is not permitted to act as counsel for either party”
- noting that pro se litigants are not excused from complying with procedural law
- noting that pro se litigants are not excused from complying with procedural law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bright, Ross, Stephenson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.