Skip to main content
· 2/12/1982

Hall v. Board of Trustees

Citations

  • 671 F.2d 269

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “[a] district court has power to dismiss an action for refusal of the plaintiff to comply with any order of court”
  • providing that pro se litigants are not excused from complying with court orders, substantive law, and procedural law
  • stating that “pro se litigants are not excused from failing to comply with substantive and procedural law”
  • noting that “pro se litigants are not excused from failing to comply with substantive and procedural law,” and that “the court is not permitted to act as counsel for either party”
  • noting that pro se litigants are not excused from complying with procedural law
  • noting that pro se litigants are not excused from complying with procedural law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bright, Ross, Stephenson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.