Hall v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Dr. Radford’s differential diagnosis methodology relied upon, inter alia, “the dosimetry calculations of Plaintiffs’ ■ dose experts” and was therefore admissible under Daubert
• “Dr. Melius evaluated the exposure of each Plaintiff by reference to the dose estimate provided by Plaintiffs’ dose experts” and therefore his testimony was admissible under Daubert

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).