Skip to main content
· 5/9/1932

Halges v. Central R.

Citations

  • 58 F.2d 169
  • 1932 U.S. App. LEXIS 4668

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that, under the plain language of ORCP 23 A, the plaintiff could amend the complaint once as a matter of law even if the court had previously dismissed the complaint, because the defendant had not yet filed a responsive pleading

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.