Skip to main content
· 6/26/1990

Haley v. Sorani (In Re Richmond Produce Co.)

Citations

  • 118 B.R. 753
  • 1990 Bankr. LEXIS 1879
  • 1990 WL 125219

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “it would be nonsensical to’ conclude that existing cáse law has exhausted every possible type of entity from whom recovery may be obtained”
  • considering “entity for whose benefit” claim, see infra

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Leslie Tchaikovsky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.