Skip to main content
· 10/27/2014

Haley v. Pugh

Citations

  • 184 Wash. App. 1017

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing cases that make the incidental versus integral distinction and those cases that simply looked at the nature of the business relationship
  • advertise- ments and contracts with landowners were evidence that timber harvesting was part of timber management and marketing company’s usual course of business

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.