Haley v. Caller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the special master “abused his discretion by excluding from his review the very evidence he stated was necessary to assist in determining the timing of the onset of injury”
• holding that the Court was “constrained to find … errors to be harmless in this case, because neither the Special Master’s inappropriate reference of an alleged viral illness nor the improper assignment of the burden of proof impacted the ultimate decision”
• finding that the special master “abused his discretion by excluding from his review the very evidence he stated was necessary to assist in determining the timing of the onset of injury”
• “[T]his Court does not generally have authority to re-weigh evidence presented and ruled upon by the Special Master, even if this court might have considered the significance of the expert testimony differently.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).