Hale v. Wigton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a defendant must attempt to reconstruct the substance of unrecorded remarks under Appellate Rule 9(C) or (E) to establish their importance
• “finding] nothing improper in the ‘length, intensity, and frequency’ of the questioning” when there was no evidence of deprivation or mistreatment and “the actual interview took up only about three hours”
• “find[ing] nothing improper in the ‘length, intensity, and frequency’ of the questioning” when there was no evidence of deprivation or mistreatment and “the actual interview took up only about three hours”
• rejecting presumption of prejudice from unrecorded sidebar conferences and recognizing that, in the absence of an attempt to reconstruct the substance of the remarks and demonstrate prejudice, the error may be considered waived
• rejecting presumption of prejudice from unrecorded sidebar conferences and recognizing that, in the absence of an attempt to reconstruct the substance of the remarks and demonstrate prejudice, the error may be considered waived
• affirming the denial of defendant's motion to suppress when a statement was made one day after defendant was advised of his Miranda rights by a different police department

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).