· 7/12/1895
Hale v. Utsey
Citations
- 44 S.C. 393
- 22 S.E. 371
- 1895 S.C. LEXIS 81
Syllabus
<p>1. Chattel Mortgage — Demand for Payment — Forfeiture—Case Criticised. — The demand by mortgagee on mortgagor, after condition broken in chattel mortgage, for payment of the debt, is not a waiver of the forfeiture, and does not revest title in the mortgagor. State v. Rice, (4) 43 S. 0., 204, approved.</p>
Judges: Pope
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.