Skip to main content
· 7/12/1895

Hale v. Utsey

Citations

  • 44 S.C. 393
  • 22 S.E. 371
  • 1895 S.C. LEXIS 81

Syllabus

<p>1. Chattel Mortgage — Demand for Payment — Forfeiture—Case Criticised. — The demand by mortgagee on mortgagor, after condition broken in chattel mortgage, for payment of the debt, is not a waiver of the forfeiture, and does not revest title in the mortgagor. State v. Rice, (4) 43 S. 0., 204, approved.</p>

Judges: Pope

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.