Hale v. Fawcett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that summary judgment should not have been entered where the proof was too uncertain to allow a jury to apportion the damages
• \There can be no recovery where speculation or conjecture must be resorted to in order to determine what caused the damage complained of.\ (citing Barnes v. Graham Virginia Quarries, Inc., 204 Va. 414, 418, 132 S.E.2d 395, 397-98 (1963)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).