· 1/12/1923
Hale v. Commonwealth
Citations
- 197 Ky. 214
- 246 S.W. 787
- 1923 Ky. LEXIS 604
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “the absence of pending parallel state proceedings militates significantly in favor of exercising jurisdiction”
- discussing other abstention doctrines applicable when a related state action is pending
- “[W]here another suit involving the same parties and presenting opportunity for ventilation of the same state law issues is pending in state court, a federal court may abstain from exercising jurisdiction over a declaratory judgment action”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thomas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.