Skip to main content
· 1/12/1923

Hale v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 197 Ky. 214
  • 246 S.W. 787
  • 1923 Ky. LEXIS 604

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “the absence of pending parallel state proceedings militates significantly in favor of exercising jurisdiction”
  • discussing other abstention doctrines applicable when a related state action is pending
  • “[W]here another suit involving the same parties and presenting opportunity for ventilation of the same state law issues is pending in state court, a federal court may abstain from exercising jurisdiction over a declaratory judgment action”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.