Halcome v. Cincinnati Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, where the insurer suspected fraud, the insureds’ refusal to provide certain information about their finances breached the insurance contract and warranted summary judgment for the insurer
• holding that the plaintiffs breached their insurance contract, which contained a provision requiring them to submit to an examination under oath, by refusing to provide information relating to their income, even though they responded to other questions under oath
• involving a theft claim and holding that where there is \evidence of possible fraud\ information concerning the insured's financial circumstances is relevant and material to the claim under investigation, including \an investigation of the suspected fraud\
• where insured submitted to an examination under oath but refused to answer questions or supply pertinent financial information

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).