Halcom v. Hall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing section 1983 claim where plaintiff provided no factual allegations of a single official or unofficial policy, failed to identify a final policymaker, and only included conclusory allegations
• “Because an officer’s use of excessive force is necessarily considered an intentional tort, it cannot, therefore, be ‘negligent’ because it is impossible to negligently commit an intentional tort.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).