Halberstadt v. Borough of Nazareth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming variance because razing heavy fortress-like building for alternative uses cost prohibitive
• rocks and slopes can constitute a unique condition of property notwithstanding the fact that other lots may also have rocks and slopes
• in a case in which a variance was granted for a massive, legally non-conforming, one-story building erected in 1914, stating that “[property owners are not required to reconstruct a building to a conforming use regardless of the financial burden.”
• in a case in which a variance was granted for a massive, legally non- conforming, one-story building erected in 1914, stating that ‘[p]roperty owners are not required to reconstruct a building to a conforming use regardless of the financial burden.’
• “A neighborhood affected by a general hardship should be rezoned.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).