Haka v. Lincoln County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the reasoning in Robinson applied equally to the FCA and that including former employees “was necessary to effectuate the provision’s primary purpose: ‘[m]aintaining unfettered access to statutory remedial mechanisms.’” (quoting Robinson, 519 U.S. at 346)
• recognizing a claim for post-employment retaliation in the decision not to rehire the plaintiff, reasoning that such hiring choices concern “the terms and conditions of employment”
• “[T]he effect of Garcetti in this circuit has been devastating for public employees asserting claims for First Amendment retaliation.”
• “[T]he effect of Garcetti in this circuit has been devastating for public employees asserting claims for First Amendment retaliation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).