· 11/20/1981
Hairline Creations, Inc. v. Diane Kefalas
Citations
- 664 F.2d 652
- 32 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1695
- 212 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 734
- 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 15845
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the trademark and patent fee-shifting provisions are “parallel provisions”
- noting that the trademark and patent fee-shifting provisions are “parallel provisions”
- A motion filed twenty-eight days after judgment was found to be untimely.
- fees awarded for obduracy integrally related to the merits
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sprecher, Bauer, Dumbauld
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.