Skip to main content
· 11/20/1981

Hairline Creations, Inc. v. Diane Kefalas

Citations

  • 664 F.2d 652
  • 32 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1695
  • 212 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 734
  • 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 15845

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the trademark and patent fee-shifting provisions are “parallel provisions”
  • noting that the trademark and patent fee-shifting provisions are “parallel provisions”
  • A motion filed twenty-eight days after judgment was found to be untimely.
  • fees awarded for obduracy integrally related to the merits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sprecher, Bauer, Dumbauld

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.