Supreme Court of Kansas· 1/17/1992
Hainline v. Bond
Citations
- 824 P.2d 959
- 250 Kan. 217
- 1992 Kan. LEXIS 18
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding immoral means unfit to teach
- \[V]agueness challenges to statutes which do not involve First Amendment freedoms must be examined in the light of the facts of the case at hand . . . . This means that the statute is judged on an 'as-applied' basis.\
- \[V]agueness challenges to statutes which do not involve First Amendment freedoms must be examined in the light of the facts of the case at hand . . . . This means that the statute is judged on an 'as-applied' basis.\
- immoral means unfit to teach to avoid unconstitutionality
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McFarland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Kansas· 2020-07-17· cited 23×
- Lehto v. Board of Education of the Caesar Rodney School DistrictSupreme Court of Delaware· 2008-12-02· cited 7×
- Wright v. Kansas State Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2012-01-20· cited 7×
- Alford v. IngramM.D. Alabama· 1996-03-20· cited 5×
- Blockbuster Video, Inc. v. City of Overland ParkCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1997-05-30· cited 3×
- Attorney General Opinion No.Kansas Attorney General Reports· 1994-09-20
- Attorney General Opinion No.Kansas Attorney General Reports· 2003-11-20
- Attorney General Opinion No.Kansas Attorney General Reports· 1995-11-01
- Attorney General Opinion No.Kansas Attorney General Reports· 1996-01-18
- State v. StubbsSupreme Court of Kansas· 2025-06-27
- State v. NinhSupreme Court of Kansas· 2025-06-27
- State v. FordSupreme Court of Kansas· 2025-06-27
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court· 1968-06-03· cited 6,021×
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court· 1982-03-03· cited 3,694×
- Shelton v. TuckerSupreme Court· 1960-12-12· cited 1,729×
- Maynard v. CartwrightSupreme Court· 1988-06-06· cited 1,367×
- Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1991-05-30· cited 1,362×
- Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court· 1957-05-06· cited 1,276×
- United States v. MazurieSupreme Court· 1975-01-21· cited 1,043×
- United States v. National Dairy Products Corp.Supreme Court· 1963-04-01· cited 902×
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court· 1975-12-09· cited 550×
- Konigsberg v. State Bar of Cal.Supreme Court· 1957-06-17· cited 333×
- Morrison v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court· 1969-11-20· cited 325×
- Barsky v. Board of Regents of the University of the State of New YorkSupreme Court· 1954-04-26· cited 214×
- Kansas State Board of Healing Arts v. FooteSupreme Court of Kansas· 1968-01-27· cited 158×
- Palmer v. City of EuclidSupreme Court· 1971-05-24· cited 130×
- Guardian Title Co. v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas· 1991-01-18· cited 58×
- Pettit v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court· 1973-09-07· cited 41×
- State Ex Rel. Miller v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Kansas· 1973-06-26· cited 37×
- Peggy BURTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CASCADE SCHOOL DISTRICT UNION HIGH SCHOOL NO. 5 Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesNinth Circuit· 1975-03-28· cited 36×
- D. Franklin Wishart, and v. Paul J. McDonald AndFirst Circuit· 1974-07-10· cited 35×
- Denton v. South Kitsap School District No. 402Court of Appeals of Washington· 1973-12-04· cited 28×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.