Hainey v. United States Department of the Interior

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it would be unreasonably burdensome to require the agency to search and review every email sent or received by 25 different employees throughout a two-year time period
• rejecting challenge to declaration in FOIA case made on knowledge and belief
• unreasonably burdensome for agency to search and review every email sent or received by 25 different employees throughout a two-year time period
• “While . . . the Department’s responses were untimely under the statute, the Department’s untimely responses, in and of themselves, do not entitle Hainey to judgment in her favor.”
• “While the Court agrees that the Department’s responses were untimely under the statute, the Department’s untimely responses, in and of themselves, do not entitle [plaintiff] to judgment in her favor.”
• “While the Court agrees that the Department’s responses were untimely under the statute, the 6 Department’s untimely responses, in and of themselves, do not entitle Hainey to judgment in her favor.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).