Skip to main content
· 4/11/2008

Haines v. Dept. of Children and Families

Citations

  • 983 So. 2d 602
  • 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 5455
  • 2007 WL 5082522

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “DCF’s conclusion that the competent, substantial evidence standard, which is an appellate standard of review, should be used as an evidentiary standard of proof in a de novo administrative hearing to resolve disputed issues of fact was plainly unreasonable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pleus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.