Haigler v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Judge Murrah wrote for the court: “We think it irreconcilably inconsistent to say in one breath that guilty knowledge of the consequences of the act done is the essence of the offense, and in the next breath say that ignorance of the consequences of those acts is no excuse.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Haigler v. United States

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Haigler v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1987-10-06· cited 11×