Haight v. THE WACKENHUT CORP.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that police officers are choosing where to dress based on their preferences when they decline to change at home because of safety, comfort, and exposure concerns
• “waiting time before any principal activity has taken place to effectively start the workday is not compensable under the FLSA”
• “waiting time before any principal activity has taken place to effectively start the workday is not compensable under the FLSA”
• deeming “[m]ost significant[]” the fact that security officers “are not required to change on [the] employer’s premises and have the option of changing at home”
• deeming “[m]ost significant[]” the fact that security officers “are not required to change on [the] employer’s premises and have the option of changing at home”
• “waiting time before any principal activity has taken place to effectively start the workday is not compensable under the FLSA”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).