Haight v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• although defendant’s lawyer did not object that restitution exceeded the scope of section 775.089(1), it was a sentencing error apparent from the face of the record and therefore did not require a contemporaneous objection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Brown v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-11-22· cited 3×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Williams
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-02-25· cited 87×
• State v. Lanxon
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-02-17· cited 5×
• Ferris v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-03-16· cited 5×
• Fykes v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-05-28· cited 2×
• Hunt v. Estate of Hunt
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-10-03· cited 1×