Skip to main content
· 1/16/1996

Hahnemann University Hospital v. Edgar

Citations

  • 74 F.3d 456
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 446

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the MHPA \presents an absolute confidentiality privilege against the disclosure of documents that `concern[ ] persons in treatment' \
  • discussing possible mandamus jurisdiction to review claim that documents were protected by, inter alia, a state law psychotherapist-patient privilege
  • discussing possible mandamus jurisdiction to review claim that documents were protected by, inter alia, a state law psychotherapist-patient privilege
  • discussing possible mandamus jurisdiction to review claim that documents were protected by, inter alia, a state law psychotherapist-patient privilege
  • discussing possible mandamus jurisdiction to review claim that documents were protected by, inter alia, a state law psychotherapist-patient privilege
  • discussing possible mandamus jurisdiction to review claim that documents were protected by, inter alia, a state law psychotherapist- patient privilege

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.