· 1/16/1996
Hahnemann University Hospital v. Edgar
Citations
- 74 F.3d 456
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 446
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the MHPA \presents an absolute confidentiality privilege against the disclosure of documents that `concern[ ] persons in treatment' \
- discussing possible mandamus jurisdiction to review claim that documents were protected by, inter alia, a state law psychotherapist-patient privilege
- discussing possible mandamus jurisdiction to review claim that documents were protected by, inter alia, a state law psychotherapist-patient privilege
- discussing possible mandamus jurisdiction to review claim that documents were protected by, inter alia, a state law psychotherapist-patient privilege
- discussing possible mandamus jurisdiction to review claim that documents were protected by, inter alia, a state law psychotherapist-patient privilege
- discussing possible mandamus jurisdiction to review claim that documents were protected by, inter alia, a state law psychotherapist- patient privilege
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.