Skip to main content
· 3/16/2011

Hahnel v. United States

Citations

  • 782 F. Supp. 2d 20
  • 2011 WL 939056

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding plaintiffs failed to allege “specific intent” where plaintiff 22 alleged that defendants intended to eliminate competition and monopolize the market but also 23 alleged the presence of other competitors in the market

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Charles J. Siragusa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.