· 3/16/2011
Hahnel v. United States
Citations
- 782 F. Supp. 2d 20
- 2011 WL 939056
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding plaintiffs failed to allege “specific intent” where plaintiff 22 alleged that defendants intended to eliminate competition and monopolize the market but also 23 alleged the presence of other competitors in the market
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Charles J. Siragusa
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.