Hahn v. Supreme Lodge of the Pathfinder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that the plaintiffs' \'fraud-based claims' … are simply repackaged failure-to-warn claims.\
• finding that a physician who reviewed the IFU but could not recall when they last reviewed it was distinguishable from Lewis v. Johnson & Johnson, wherein the physician testified they did not rely on the IFU
• collecting cases finding the learned intermediary doctrine extends to all claims based on a failure to warn, including fraud-based claims
• stating “an argument raised for the first time in a reply brief or memorandum will not be considered.”
• stating “an argument raised for the first time in a reply brief or memorandum will not be considered.”
• awarding judgment to Ethicon on fraud, fraudulent concealment, constructive fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of warranty claims under Illinois law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).