Hahn v. Rauch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defamation claim was not completely preempted by ERISA because it did not “seek to enforce the terms of an employee benefit plan and [was] not equivalent to an ERISA enforcement action”
• finding new substantive ground for removal waived because raised only in the opposition to remand
• “Defendants do not cite any specific portion of the Local’s constitution or explain what type of interpretation might be required.”
• “A defendant cannot argue a new substantive ground as a basis for removal in opposing remand.”
• “A defendant cannot argue a new substantive ground as a basis for removal in opposing remand.”
• “A defendant cannot argue a new substantive ground as a basis for removal in opposing remand.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).