Skip to main content

Hahn v. Farmakis-King

Citations

  • 238 N.E.3d 147
  • 2024 Ohio 786

Syllabus

CIVIL - complaint for in rem foreclosure married couple separate assets promissory note made by husband to wife for $100,000 note included confession of judgment provision domiciliaries and residents of Pennsylvania contract entered in Pennsylvania funds located in Pennsylvania Pennsylvania law governs mortgage secured promissory note real property located in Ohio Ohio court has subject matter jurisdiction over foreclosure actions relating to real property in a respective county Ohio lacks jurisdiction to enforce promissory note entered in Pennsylvania no error in denying motion for summary judgment.

Judges: Lucci

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Hahn v. Farmakis-King

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.