· 4/16/1985
Hahn, Michael S. And Bradley, B. Shay and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. United States
Citations
- 757 F.2d 581
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the Tucker Act “gives the Claims Court jurisdiction over non-tort claims against the United States, and gives the district courts concurrent jurisdiction over such claims not exceeding $10,000.”
- remanding to district court with directions to either permit plaintiffs to amend their complaint to waive damages in excess of $10,000 or to transfer those claims to the Claims Court
- “We may, on appeal, consider whether jurisdiction was proper on grounds—such as the Tucker Act—not asserted below.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Adams, Higginbotham, Sloviter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.