Skip to main content
· 4/16/1985

Hahn, Michael S. And Bradley, B. Shay and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. United States

Citations

  • 757 F.2d 581

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the Tucker Act “gives the Claims Court jurisdiction over non-tort claims against the United States, and gives the district courts concurrent jurisdiction over such claims not exceeding $10,000.”
  • remanding to district court with directions to either permit plaintiffs to amend their complaint to waive damages in excess of $10,000 or to transfer those claims to the Claims Court
  • “We may, on appeal, consider whether jurisdiction was proper on grounds—such as the Tucker Act—not asserted below.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adams, Higginbotham, Sloviter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.