Hagos v. Reading Transit & Light Co.

Citations

• 66 Pa. Super. 422
• 1917 Pa. Super. LEXIS 280

Syllabus

<p>Negligence — Street railways — Injury to child — Conflicting testimony — Case for jury.</p> <p>In ail action against a street railway company to recover damages for personal injuries to a child seven years old, the case is for the jury, and a verdict and judgment for tbe plaintiff will be sustained where it appears from the way in which the case was developed at the trial, that the jury had as much right to infer that the accident was the result of the motorman not watching the street ahead of him, as to infer, in the absence of any evidence of exactly what the circumstances were, that the child darted out in front of the ear.</p>