Skip to main content
· 6/20/2001

Hagopian v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc.

Citations

  • 788 So. 2d 1088
  • 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8332
  • 2001 WL 686915

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • setting forth the six elements for a claim of spoliation, also known as a claim for the negligent destruction of evidence
  • implicitly recognizing a retail establishment's duty to preserve evidence—a broken bottle—in the absence of any contract, statute or administrative regulation
  • products liability action in which allegedly defective bottle was disposed of by defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Warner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.