Haggard v. Division of Employment Security

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that Rule 5.29(c)’s reference to a “business entity authorized by law” does not include the Division of Employment Security, which is a state agency
• “Contrary to [employerj’s assertions, nothing mandates dismissal of this action because [the agency] was improperly represented by a non-lawyer unless the error was raised and preserved.”
• “DES is not entitled to be represented by a non-lawyer employee”
• “DES is not entitled to be represented by a non-lawyer employee”
• parties “cannot consent to the unauthorized practice of law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).