Skip to main content
· 7/2/2013

Hagensen v. Ferro, Kuba, Mangano, Skylar, Gacovino & Lake, P.C.

Citations

  • 108 A.D.3d 410
  • 969 N.Y.S.2d 34

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reaffirming our conclusion in Matter of Bahta, 22 I&N Dec. 1381, 1390 (BIA 2000), that the receipt of stolen property parenthetical in section 101(a)(43)(G
  • relying on Randhawa v. Ashcroft, 298 F.3d 1148, 1154 (9th Cir. 2002)
  • “[W]e hold that under the law of the Ninth Circuit, the mental state of ‘reason to believe’ in section 205.273(1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.