· 7/2/2013
Hagensen v. Ferro, Kuba, Mangano, Skylar, Gacovino & Lake, P.C.
Citations
- 108 A.D.3d 410
- 969 N.Y.S.2d 34
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reaffirming our conclusion in Matter of Bahta, 22 I&N Dec. 1381, 1390 (BIA 2000), that the receipt of stolen property parenthetical in section 101(a)(43)(G
- relying on Randhawa v. Ashcroft, 298 F.3d 1148, 1154 (9th Cir. 2002)
- “[W]e hold that under the law of the Ninth Circuit, the mental state of ‘reason to believe’ in section 205.273(1
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.