Hagenberg v. Avedisian

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the Court \is free to decide a case on grounds other than those relied upon by the trial justice\
• explaining that “[t]he IOD statute never was intended to supplement a retired officer’s retirement benefits”
• acknowledging that the Court can affirm a judgment on different grounds than those relied upon by the lower tribunal
• “An injured officer employed by a municipality that has its own retirement system is restricted to the benefits provided by the particular statutory scheme.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).