Skip to main content
· 10/25/1966

Haga v. King Coal Chevrolet Company

Citations

  • 150 S.E.2d 599
  • 151 W. Va. 125
  • 1966 W. Va. LEXIS 207

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that upon motion for summary judgment all exhibits and affidavits and other matters submitted by both parties should be considered
  • holding that upon motion for summary judgment all exhibits and affidavits and other matters submitted by both parties should be considered
  • holding that upon motion for summary judgment all exhibits and affidavits and other matters submitted by both parties should be considered
  • “Upon motion for a summary judgment . . . all exhibits and affidavits and other matters submitted by both parties should be considered by the court….”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Berry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.