Skip to main content
· 10/6/1978

Hafling v. Inlandboatmen's Union of the Pacific

Citations

  • 585 P.2d 870
  • 99 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3060
  • 1978 Alas. LEXIS 699

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the legislature is presumed to be indicating a substantive change in the law when it amends a statute
  • letter of intent accompanying bill to amend statute considered indicative of amendment’s meaning
  • “Legislative intent is the key and if the inconsistency between the two enactments is not fatal to the operation of either, the two may stand together and there will be no implied repeal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boochever, Witz, Connor, Burke, Matthews

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.