Hafford v. Great Northern Nekoosa Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Maine’s recreational use statute applied to an outfitter who was injured while supplying canoeing and camping enthusiasts
• holding an outfitter supplying canoeing and camping enthusiasts was engaged in activity with a recreational purpose when transporting his staff to pick up his clients’ vehicles
• stating that “[w]e construe the immunity provision of section 159-A broadly”
• stating that \[w]e construe the immunity provision of section 159-A broadly\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).