Haemonetics Corp. v. Dupre

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• debt held to be nondischargeable because wife knew excess funds in joint checking account were stolen but wrote checks on the funds
• debtor’s liability for husband’s embezzlement was nondischargeable under § 523(a)(6) where she knew the excess funds were stolen and wrote checks drawing upon those funds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).