Haehl v. Washington Mutual Bank, F.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding state claims, including unjust enrichment, regarding improperly charged fees preempted because imposing liability effectively would impose requirements regarding loan-related fees
• finding that Indiana’s regulation of reconveyance fees charged by a federal savings association was preempted by 12 C.F.R. § 560.2
• a state commercial law was preempted where plaintiff alleged loan-related fees were not bona fide or reasonable under that state law
• reconveyance fee \falls within the broad category of `loan-related fees'\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).