· 2/11/1992
Hadnot v. Shaw
Citations
- 826 P.2d 978
- 63 O.B.A.J. 442
- 1992 OK 21
- 1992 Okla. LEXIS 25
- 1992 WL 21418
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that statements contained in letter were not defamatory, even assuming “the lay leader communicated the letters’ contents outside the Church”
- “[s]overeign only within her own domain, the church has no power over those who live outside of the spiritual community”
- “Internal ecclesiastical procedure need not meet any constitutional concept of due process.” (Emphasis omitted.)
- physician's unauthorized taking of photographs of hospital patient who was near death invaded patient's legally protected right to privacy
- physician's unauthorized taking of photographs of hospital patient who was near death invaded patient's legally protected right to privacy
- “Because religious judicature is immune from any civil court inquest, it is also protected from intrusion by discovery.” (emphasis omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Opala, Lavender, Doolin, Hargrave, Summers, Hodges, Vii, Viii, Simms, Wilson, Kauger
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.