Skip to main content
· 2/11/1992

Hadnot v. Shaw

Citations

  • 826 P.2d 978
  • 63 O.B.A.J. 442
  • 1992 OK 21
  • 1992 Okla. LEXIS 25
  • 1992 WL 21418

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that statements contained in letter were not defamatory, even assuming “the lay leader communicated the letters’ contents outside the Church”
  • “[s]overeign only within her own domain, the church has no power over those who live outside of the spiritual community”
  • “Internal ecclesiastical procedure need not meet any constitutional concept of due process.” (Emphasis omitted.)
  • physician's unauthorized taking of photographs of hospital patient who was near death invaded patient's legally protected right to privacy
  • physician's unauthorized taking of photographs of hospital patient who was near death invaded patient's legally protected right to privacy
  • “Because religious judicature is immune from any civil court inquest, it is also protected from intrusion by discovery.” (emphasis omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Opala, Lavender, Doolin, Hargrave, Summers, Hodges, Vii, Viii, Simms, Wilson, Kauger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.