Skip to main content
· 5/15/1834

Hadly v. Pugh

Citations

  • 1 Wright 554
  • 1 Ohio Ch. 554

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial court erred by not allowing the plaintiff to introduce evidence of prior dealings with the defendant
  • “If, as part of the transaction in explaining the term, one of the parties had made an admission as to [what a term meant,] that would be admissible against him.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lane

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.