Skip to main content
· 10/6/2000

Hadlock v. Anderson

Citations

  • 540 S.E.2d 282
  • 246 Ga. App. 291
  • 2000 Fulton County D. Rep. 4106
  • 2000 Ga. App. LEXIS 1210

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • taken in connection with suspicious circumstances, an inadequate price raises a “vehement presumption of fraud”
  • Supreme Court declined to hear the appeal because “any equitable issues in the case involving the cancellation of deeds appeared to be ancillary to the legal issue of whether the Hadlocks fraudulently conveyed property”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, Smith, Phipps

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.