Skip to main content
· 11/18/2003

Hadley v. Ryan

Citations

  • 803 N.E.2d 48
  • 345 Ill. App. 3d 297
  • 280 Ill. Dec. 818

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that mandamus is a remedy to compel “a public official or public body to perform a ministerial duty”
  • holding mandamus could not be used to compel the Attorney General to prosecute a claim; where, by statute, the decision to prosecute was within the officer’s discretion
  • stating one factor that should be considered when determining whether to allow an amendment is “whether the amendment would cure a defect in the pleadings”
  • mandamus could not be used to compel the Attorney General to prosecute a claim; by statute, the decision to prosecute was within his discretion
  • mandamus may not be used to direct an official to reach a particular decision or exercise his or her discretion in a particular manner
  • mandamus may not be used to direct the official to reach a particular decision or exercise his discretion in a particular manner

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Myerscough, Knecht, Steigmann

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.