· 11/18/2003
Hadley v. Ryan
Citations
- 803 N.E.2d 48
- 345 Ill. App. 3d 297
- 280 Ill. Dec. 818
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that mandamus is a remedy to compel “a public official or public body to perform a ministerial duty”
- holding mandamus could not be used to compel the Attorney General to prosecute a claim; where, by statute, the decision to prosecute was within the officer’s discretion
- stating one factor that should be considered when determining whether to allow an amendment is “whether the amendment would cure a defect in the pleadings”
- mandamus could not be used to compel the Attorney General to prosecute a claim; by statute, the decision to prosecute was within his discretion
- mandamus may not be used to direct an official to reach a particular decision or exercise his or her discretion in a particular manner
- mandamus may not be used to direct the official to reach a particular decision or exercise his discretion in a particular manner
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Myerscough, Knecht, Steigmann
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.